Abolish the Monarchy: Why we should and how we will

Product Information

By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. The welfare state has been vandalised, housing has become prohibitively expensive, workers’ rights have been eroded – and the rich have got richer because of it.

With this book, Graham Smith establishes himself not just as the CEO of the British Republican Movement but also a leading UK spokesperson in the movement to abolish the British monarchy. Finance is provided by PayPal Credit (a trading name of PayPal UK Ltd, Whittaker House, Whittaker Avenue, Richmond-Upon-Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom, TW9 1EH). In 1924, the Mongolian People's Republic was established, bringing an end to the monarchy in Mongolia.The book also sets out a clear blueprint, not just of what kind of republic we should aspire to be – something that is often lacking in other republican texts – but also of the road to that republic. Next, Smith explains the evolution of Britain’s constitutional monarchy; how near-unlimited powers of the crown shifted over to parliamentary control. The monarchy was officially abolished by the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, which came into force in 1949. In 1947, Francisco Franco declared Spain a monarchy but kept himself as regent for life with the constitutional setup essentially unchanged.

Abolition of absolutist monarchy in favor of limited government under constitutional monarchy is a less radical form of anti-royalism that has succeeded in some nations that still retain monarchs, such as Sweden, Spain, and Thailand. They say Britain should be proud to have the mother of parliaments, to be a shining beacon of democracy and an example to other nations. He brings to his subject a wealth of knowledge, but also a wealth of experience in making effective arguments, challenging monarchists and winning people over to the cause. This is not to ‘have a pop’, but to make a point, saying it’s unlikely these individuals would be elected.Under the leadership of Oliver Cromwell, in 1649, King Charles I was tried for high treason, convicted and executed. While I know we are a constitutional monarchy Smith goes into the framework of government to examine how power is not exercised by King or Queen but is subservient to that Prime Minister. With the promulgation of the Indian constitution in 1950, India abolished its monarchy under the British crown and became a Republic within the Commonwealth of Nations, followed by Pakistan in 1956; as a result of both developments, the majority of the princes formally lost their sovereign rights.

Wait until the consensus is much greater and don’t make a fuss now, they argue, ignoring the fact that much of the change in opinion has come through the efforts of people like Graham Smith, campaigning for years. As with many books, I imagine, the publication timing is selected deliberately because it might benefit sales.It might be suggested that if you abolish royalty, then all connected to it must go - Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, the Tower of London, etc. There was a coup plot by Al Islah (United Arab Emirates) to overthrow the monarchy of the United Arab Emirates and establish an Islamic republic. August marked the 75th anniversary of the partition of the Indian subcontinent, when a British civil servant carved up the territory after spending 10 weeks in the region.

Read more about the condition New: A new, unread, unused book in perfect condition with no missing or damaged pages.King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy had remained King after the Fall of the Fascist regime in Italy but transferred most of his powers to his son after the Armistice of Cassibile. The sector (charities) would be no worse off if royal patronage ended tomorrow", thus implying to me that the Duke's Awards would have been as, if not more, successful had they been named, for example, "Hahn and Hunt Awards" ! The proposal was rejected in all states, with only the Australian Capital Territory voting in favor. Plus, there were always the arguments that the monarchy bring in huge revenues in tourism and that the British public overwhelmingly loved the royal family.